DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NR08634-13
8 May 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 May 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion (A/O) furnished by the Navy Personnel Command
(NPC) memo 5420 Ser 91/027 of 6 Mar 2014, a copy of which was
provided to you om 27 March 2014. You had 30 days to respond,
but failed to do so.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice in your application. In making this
determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
- comments contained in the aA/o. Therefore, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that more favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
Docket Mo.NRO8634-13
1 record, the burden is on the applicant to
official nava
erial error or
demonstrate the existence of probable mat
injustice.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5126 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5S126-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1007 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered the application on 12 May 2014. regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. - After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9347 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materiai submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No .NRO9347-13 ecora, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8212 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3463 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6486 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval.